Question 1190

A team has chosen Regional pricing differences to estimate deployment costs using actual AWS Region prices. Which description explains the mechanism that makes this selection appropriate?

  1. Pricing for many AWS resources varies by location and service settings.
  2. Outbound traffic may generate data-transfer charges depending on service and free allowances.
  3. This capability apply commitments with more specific EC2 attributes.
  4. On-Demand pricing charges eligible compute capacity as it is used without a term commitment.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Regional pricing differences meets the goal to estimate deployment costs using actual AWS Region prices because pricing for many AWS resources varies by location and service settings. A generic global average cannot replace a Region-specific estimate.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That description belongs to Data transfer out to internet because outbound traffic may generate data-transfer charges depending on service and free allowances; it is used to estimate egress charges for delivering AWS data to external users, not to explain how Regional pricing differences provides the function to estimate deployment costs using actual AWS Region prices.

C:

That description belongs to EC2 Instance Savings Plans because EC2 Instance Savings Plans apply commitments with more specific EC2 attributes; it is used to obtain discounted EC2 compute use in a selected instance family and Region, not to explain how Regional pricing differences provides the function to estimate deployment costs using actual AWS Region prices.

D:

That description belongs to EC2 On-Demand Instances because on-Demand pricing charges eligible compute capacity as it is used without a term commitment; it is used to run flexible compute without a long-term usage commitment, not to explain how Regional pricing differences provides the function to estimate deployment costs using actual AWS Region prices.

Question 1191

A cloud team wants to estimate egress charges for delivering AWS data to external users. It has considered Cross-Region data transfer, whose main role is to account for charges when moving data between AWS Regions. Which other selection is more tightly matched to the actual task?

  1. Regional pricing differences
  2. Serverless invocation pricing
  3. Data transfer out to internet
  4. Cross-Region data transfer

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Data transfer out to internet addresses the new need to estimate egress charges for delivering AWS data to external users because outbound traffic may generate data-transfer charges depending on service and free allowances; Cross-Region data transfer supports the different existing task to account for charges when moving data between AWS Regions.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Regional pricing differences is intended to estimate deployment costs using actual AWS Region prices because pricing for many AWS resources varies by location and service settings; in this design the new outcome is to estimate egress charges for delivering AWS data to external users, which calls for Data transfer out to internet rather than Regional pricing differences or the earlier Cross-Region data transfer.

B:

Serverless invocation pricing is intended to align charges with events and execution rather than idle VM runtime because services such as Lambda charge based on request and execution characteristics under their pricing models; in this design the new outcome is to estimate egress charges for delivering AWS data to external users, which calls for Data transfer out to internet rather than Serverless invocation pricing or the earlier Cross-Region data transfer.

D:

Cross-Region data transfer primarily supports the earlier need to account for charges when moving data between AWS Regions because data transferred between Regions can incur regional transfer charges, but the new task is to estimate egress charges for delivering AWS data to external users; that is why Data transfer out to internet is preferable here.

Question 1192

During the purchasing decision, the requirement is to reduce long-term archive storage cost when retrieval is infrequent. Which option best addresses that exact requirement?

  1. S3 Glacier storage pricing
  2. Convertible Reserved Instances
  3. Serverless invocation pricing
  4. EC2 Instance Savings Plans

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

S3 Glacier storage pricing matches the goal to reduce long-term archive storage cost when retrieval is infrequent because S3 Glacier classes trade cheaper storage for restore characteristics and other charges. Slow archival classes are a poor fit for instant-access requirements. Serverless invocation pricing is for the different objective to align charges with events and execution rather than idle VM runtime.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Convertible Reserved Instances addresses the separate need to retain more options to exchange eligible RI configurations over a term because convertible RIs allow qualifying exchanges under program rules; it is not as direct as S3 Glacier storage pricing for the actual requirement to reduce long-term archive storage cost when retrieval is infrequent.

C:

Serverless invocation pricing addresses the separate need to align charges with events and execution rather than idle VM runtime because services such as Lambda charge based on request and execution characteristics under their pricing models; it is not as direct as S3 Glacier storage pricing for the actual requirement to reduce long-term archive storage cost when retrieval is infrequent.

D:

EC2 Instance Savings Plans addresses the separate need to obtain discounted EC2 compute use in a selected instance family and Region because EC2 Instance Savings Plans apply commitments with more specific EC2 attributes; it is not as direct as S3 Glacier storage pricing for the actual requirement to reduce long-term archive storage cost when retrieval is infrequent.

Question 1193

The workload already uses EC2 Instance Savings Plans to obtain discounted EC2 compute use in a selected instance family and Region. A second workstream needs to assess how much committed hourly spend is actually used. Which AWS choice fits the second workstream?

  1. Storage request pricing
  2. Savings Plans commitment utilization
  3. EC2 Instance Savings Plans
  4. Pay-as-you-go consumption

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Savings Plans commitment utilization addresses the new need to assess how much committed hourly spend is actually used because savings Plans savings depend on consuming eligible compute against a recurring commitment; EC2 Instance Savings Plans supports the different existing task to obtain discounted EC2 compute use in a selected instance family and Region.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Storage request pricing is intended to include operations alongside capacity when estimating object-storage spend because object storage can charge for API requests in addition to stored gigabytes; in this design the new outcome is to assess how much committed hourly spend is actually used, which calls for Savings Plans commitment utilization rather than Storage request pricing or the earlier EC2 Instance Savings Plans.

C:

EC2 Instance Savings Plans primarily supports the earlier need to obtain discounted EC2 compute use in a selected instance family and Region because EC2 Instance Savings Plans apply commitments with more specific EC2 attributes, but the new task is to assess how much committed hourly spend is actually used; that is why Savings Plans commitment utilization is preferable here.

D:

Pay-as-you-go consumption is intended to replace much upfront infrastructure spending with metered service usage because AWS prices many resources based on usage duration volume requests or capacity; in this design the new outcome is to assess how much committed hourly spend is actually used, which calls for Savings Plans commitment utilization rather than Pay-as-you-go consumption or the earlier EC2 Instance Savings Plans.

Question 1194

A cloud finance team has been asked to reuse eligible existing software licenses on approved AWS infrastructure. Which AWS service, capability, or concept most directly meets the stated need?

  1. Bring Your Own License
  2. Cross-Region data transfer
  3. License Included EC2 pricing
  4. Standard Reserved Instances

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Bring Your Own License matches the goal to reuse eligible existing software licenses on approved AWS infrastructure because bYOL relies on vendor eligibility and compliance with license-specific conditions. Not every software edition or tenancy arrangement supports BYOL. Standard Reserved Instances is for the different objective to prioritize stronger discounts for relatively stable EC2 requirements.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Cross-Region data transfer addresses the separate need to account for charges when moving data between AWS Regions because data transferred between Regions can incur regional transfer charges; it is not as direct as Bring Your Own License for the actual requirement to reuse eligible existing software licenses on approved AWS infrastructure.

C:

License Included EC2 pricing addresses the separate need to use eligible prepackaged software licensing through AWS charging because license Included offerings bundle supported software license costs in AWS usage pricing; it is not as direct as Bring Your Own License for the actual requirement to reuse eligible existing software licenses on approved AWS infrastructure.

D:

Standard Reserved Instances addresses the separate need to prioritize stronger discounts for relatively stable EC2 requirements because standard RIs offer commitment-based EC2 savings with restricted modification flexibility; it is not as direct as Bring Your Own License for the actual requirement to reuse eligible existing software licenses on approved AWS infrastructure.

Question 1195

A decision record states that the primary objective is to discount predictable eligible EC2 instance usage under a commitment. Which AWS offering or principle should it name?

  1. EC2 Dedicated Instances
  2. EC2 Reserved Instances
  3. Standard Reserved Instances
  4. EC2 Spot Instances

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

EC2 Reserved Instances matches the goal to discount predictable eligible EC2 instance usage under a commitment because reserved Instance benefits are linked to defined term and instance attributes. A billing reservation may not always guarantee physical capacity without a capacity reservation. Standard Reserved Instances is for the different objective to prioritize stronger discounts for relatively stable EC2 requirements; the requested capability is EC2 Reserved Instances to discount predictable eligible EC2 instance usage under a commitment, in contrast with Standard Reserved Instances to prioritize stronger discounts for relatively stable EC2 requirements.

Incorrect Answers

A:

EC2 Dedicated Instances addresses the separate need to run instances on hardware dedicated to one AWS customer because dedicated Instances provide single-customer tenancy on EC2 infrastructure; it is not as direct as EC2 Reserved Instances for the actual requirement to discount predictable eligible EC2 instance usage under a commitment.

C:

Standard Reserved Instances addresses the separate need to prioritize stronger discounts for relatively stable EC2 requirements because standard RIs offer commitment-based EC2 savings with restricted modification flexibility; it is not as direct as EC2 Reserved Instances for the actual requirement to discount predictable eligible EC2 instance usage under a commitment.

D:

EC2 Spot Instances addresses the separate need to run interruptible compute at potentially deep discounts because Spot Instances use spare EC2 capacity and can be interrupted when AWS needs it; it is not as direct as EC2 Reserved Instances for the actual requirement to discount predictable eligible EC2 instance usage under a commitment.

Question 1196

A solution uses License Included EC2 pricing for the requirement to use eligible prepackaged software licensing through AWS charging. Which operating behavior underlies that use?

  1. License Included offerings bundle supported software license costs in AWS usage pricing.
  2. BYOL relies on vendor eligibility and compliance with license-specific conditions.
  3. Dedicated Hosts allocate physical EC2 host capacity to a single customer.
  4. Spreading Spot use among instance types and Availability Zones can reduce reliance on one capacity pool.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

License Included EC2 pricing meets the goal to use eligible prepackaged software licensing through AWS charging because license Included offerings bundle supported software license costs in AWS usage pricing. They are different from reusing separately purchased existing licenses.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That description belongs to Bring Your Own License because bYOL relies on vendor eligibility and compliance with license-specific conditions; it is used to reuse eligible existing software licenses on approved AWS infrastructure, not to explain how License Included EC2 pricing provides the function to use eligible prepackaged software licensing through AWS charging.

C:

That description belongs to EC2 Dedicated Hosts because dedicated Hosts allocate physical EC2 host capacity to a single customer; it is used to meet physical-host visibility and software licensing constraints, not to explain how License Included EC2 pricing provides the function to use eligible prepackaged software licensing through AWS charging.

D:

That description belongs to Spot fleet resilience because spreading Spot use among instance types and Availability Zones can reduce reliance on one capacity pool; it is used to diversify interruptible capacity across eligible pools, not to explain how License Included EC2 pricing provides the function to use eligible prepackaged software licensing through AWS charging.

Question 1197

A solution has 2 separate requirements: first, forecast full cost when reading from infrequent-access tiers; second, meet physical-host visibility and software licensing constraints. Which TWO choices correspond most directly to these needs? Choose TWO.

  1. License Included EC2 pricing
  2. EC2 Dedicated Hosts
  3. EC2 Spot Instances
  4. S3 retrieval fees
  5. Storage request pricing

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

EC2 Dedicated Hosts covers the listed need to meet physical-host visibility and software licensing constraints because dedicated Hosts allocate physical EC2 host capacity to a single customer; it belongs in the keyed set alongside S3 retrieval fees to forecast full cost when reading from infrequent-access tiers.

D:

S3 retrieval fees covers the listed need to forecast full cost when reading from infrequent-access tiers because some S3 storage classes charge for data retrieval as well as storage; it belongs in the keyed set alongside EC2 Dedicated Hosts to meet physical-host visibility and software licensing constraints.

Incorrect Answers

A:

License Included EC2 pricing addresses a different objective, to use eligible prepackaged software licensing through AWS charging, because license Included offerings bundle supported software license costs in AWS usage pricing; the checklist instead requires the distinct outcomes to forecast full cost when reading from infrequent-access tiers; meet physical-host visibility and software licensing constraints.

C:

EC2 Spot Instances addresses a different objective, to run interruptible compute at potentially deep discounts, because Spot Instances use spare EC2 capacity and can be interrupted when AWS needs it; the checklist instead requires the distinct outcomes to forecast full cost when reading from infrequent-access tiers; meet physical-host visibility and software licensing constraints.

E:

Storage request pricing addresses a different objective, to include operations alongside capacity when estimating object-storage spend, because object storage can charge for API requests in addition to stored gigabytes; the checklist instead requires the distinct outcomes to forecast full cost when reading from infrequent-access tiers; meet physical-host visibility and software licensing constraints.

Question 1198

In a design comparison, License Included EC2 pricing is associated with the objective to use eligible prepackaged software licensing through AWS charging. For the distinct objective to reuse eligible existing software licenses on approved AWS infrastructure, which option should be preferred?

  1. EC2 Dedicated Hosts
  2. Bring Your Own License
  3. Spot fleet resilience
  4. License Included EC2 pricing

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Bring Your Own License addresses the new need to reuse eligible existing software licenses on approved AWS infrastructure because bYOL relies on vendor eligibility and compliance with license-specific conditions; License Included EC2 pricing supports the different existing task to use eligible prepackaged software licensing through AWS charging.

Incorrect Answers

A:

EC2 Dedicated Hosts is intended to meet physical-host visibility and software licensing constraints because dedicated Hosts allocate physical EC2 host capacity to a single customer; in this design the new outcome is to reuse eligible existing software licenses on approved AWS infrastructure, which calls for Bring Your Own License rather than EC2 Dedicated Hosts or the earlier License Included EC2 pricing.

C:

Spot fleet resilience is intended to diversify interruptible capacity across eligible pools because spreading Spot use among instance types and Availability Zones can reduce reliance on one capacity pool; in this design the new outcome is to reuse eligible existing software licenses on approved AWS infrastructure, which calls for Bring Your Own License rather than Spot fleet resilience or the earlier License Included EC2 pricing.

D:

License Included EC2 pricing primarily supports the earlier need to use eligible prepackaged software licensing through AWS charging because license Included offerings bundle supported software license costs in AWS usage pricing, but the new task is to reuse eligible existing software licenses on approved AWS infrastructure; that is why Bring Your Own License is preferable here.

Question 1199

For a new AWS implementation, a team must diversify interruptible capacity across eligible pools. Which available choice is most specifically intended for that function?

  1. EC2 Dedicated Hosts
  2. EC2 Spot Instances
  3. Storage request pricing
  4. Spot fleet resilience

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Spot fleet resilience matches the goal to diversify interruptible capacity across eligible pools because spreading Spot use among instance types and Availability Zones can reduce reliance on one capacity pool. Diversification reduces risk but cannot guarantee no interruptions. Storage request pricing is for the different objective to include operations alongside capacity when estimating object-storage spend; the requested capability is Spot fleet resilience to diversify interruptible capacity across eligible pools, in contrast with Storage request pricing to include operations alongside capacity when estimating object-storage spend.

Incorrect Answers

A:

EC2 Dedicated Hosts addresses the separate need to meet physical-host visibility and software licensing constraints because dedicated Hosts allocate physical EC2 host capacity to a single customer; it is not as direct as Spot fleet resilience for the actual requirement to diversify interruptible capacity across eligible pools.

B:

EC2 Spot Instances addresses the separate need to run interruptible compute at potentially deep discounts because Spot Instances use spare EC2 capacity and can be interrupted when AWS needs it; it is not as direct as Spot fleet resilience for the actual requirement to diversify interruptible capacity across eligible pools.

C:

Storage request pricing addresses the separate need to include operations alongside capacity when estimating object-storage spend because object storage can charge for API requests in addition to stored gigabytes; it is not as direct as Spot fleet resilience for the actual requirement to diversify interruptible capacity across eligible pools.

Question 1200

A team has chosen S3 Glacier storage pricing to reduce long-term archive storage cost when retrieval is infrequent. Which description explains the mechanism that makes this selection appropriate?

  1. Some S3 storage classes charge for data retrieval as well as storage.
  2. S3 Glacier classes trade cheaper storage for restore characteristics and other charges.
  3. On-Demand pricing charges eligible compute capacity as it is used without a term commitment.
  4. S3 Standard storage charges are based on eligible stored capacity and additional request categories.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

S3 Glacier storage pricing meets the goal to reduce long-term archive storage cost when retrieval is infrequent because S3 Glacier classes trade cheaper storage for restore characteristics and other charges. Slow archival classes are a poor fit for instant-access requirements.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That description belongs to S3 retrieval fees because some S3 storage classes charge for data retrieval as well as storage; it is used to forecast full cost when reading from infrequent-access tiers, not to explain how S3 Glacier storage pricing provides the function to reduce long-term archive storage cost when retrieval is infrequent.

C:

That description belongs to EC2 On-Demand Instances because on-Demand pricing charges eligible compute capacity as it is used without a term commitment; it is used to run flexible compute without a long-term usage commitment, not to explain how S3 Glacier storage pricing provides the function to reduce long-term archive storage cost when retrieval is infrequent.

D:

That description belongs to S3 Standard pricing because S3 Standard storage charges are based on eligible stored capacity and additional request categories; it is used to compare storage cost for frequently accessed objects, not to explain how S3 Glacier storage pricing provides the function to reduce long-term archive storage cost when retrieval is infrequent.

AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Practice Tests